guide · ai

Picking the Default LLM for the Botsitter-Review Skill

How to pick the default LLM for the botsitter-review skill: a four-axis decision (cost, latency, instruction following, context), per-skill alternates, and the live AI Model Matrix as the price list.

July 14, 2026 · By Alastair Fraser

A friendly retro robot at a model-selection switchboard with four labeled toggles (COST, LATENCY, INSTRUCTION, CONTEXT), each positioned by a dial between a left setting (cheap / fast / loose / short) and a right setting (expensive / slow / strict / long), pointing at a chosen model name lit up on a small display.

What “default model” even means

The botsitter-review skill ships with a model name pinned in its system prompt. Every voice-note → draft → post cycle uses that model by default unless the operator overrides with --provider anthropic --model <X>. The default isn’t a global; it’s the skill’s preferred model.

A wrong default costs the operator across every review:

  • 100x the per-call cost over a year if the pinned model is Opus and Haiku would have done the job.
  • 30s of extra latency per draft if the pinned model is a slow reasoning tier.
  • Lower-quality drafts if the pinned model is the cheapest tier that cannot keep the body in 5–7 paragraphs.

Operators who treat the default as a “pick once and forget” setting leak money on the easy calls and starve the hard ones.

The four-way decision

Every model choice collapses to four axes. Cost dominates the monthly bill, but the other three axes decide whether a given draft is usable.

AxisWhat it costsWhat it saves
Per-token cost$0.50–$15 per million tokens depending on provider and modelCheaper monthly bill, headroom for the hard drafts
Latency5–30s per chat response depending on modelFaster operator feedback loop; tighter review batches
Instruction followingModel cannot keep the body in 5–7 paragraphs, drifts on the transcript, or invents spec linesWorse drafts, more retries, more manual edits before publish
Context windowMax input + output tokens; long transcripts plus a multi-page system prompt can hit a small windowAllows longer voice-notes, longer compare tables, multi-product batches in one call

A first-pass review draft is a 2,000–3,500 token job: transcript plus system prompt in, structured markdown out. Every reasonable modern model handles it. The decision is which axes matter most for the operator’s usage pattern — volume, batch size, voice-note length, and rejection rate.

Cost is the axis most operators optimize for, but “cheap” is not free. Picking the cheapest model that won’t follow the system prompt saves cents per call and burns tens of minutes per draft in cleanup. The four axes are a dial cluster: turning one affects the others.

The default choices on ABS today

For voice-note review drafting, the ABS production stack uses three model tiers mapped to three job types:

  • First draft: Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5 mini. Cheap, fast, follows instructions well for short structured jobs. Roughly $0.01–$0.03 per draft.
  • Review pass / quality tightening: Sonnet 5 or GPT-5. Catches the body-flow issues Haiku misses on longer transcripts. Roughly $0.05–$0.10 per pass.
  • Image alt-text generation: Cheap model — Haiku 4.5 or a smaller open-weight model via OpenRouter. Short and mechanical.

The “default” — the model the skill pins for the first-pass draft — should be Haiku 4.5 for voice-note review. The system prompt is well-tuned and short enough that it does not need a frontier model to follow it. The body length, paragraph structure, and “For the nerds” footer are hard-coded constraints; a small model holds them reliably. Save the upgraded model for the review-pass step or for manual low-confidence-draft reruns.

Pinning Haiku 4.5 as the default does not mean every call lands there; the operator can promote any single draft to Sonnet 5 with --model claude-sonnet-5. The default is the floor of the cost curve, not the ceiling of the capability curve.

Reading the live AI Model Matrix

The dashboard at https://agenticbotsitter.com/websites/ai-model-matrix/model-matrix.html is the canonical price list. Refresh it before any model change because prices move — a June claude-sonnet-4.5 is often a different price from a July claude-sonnet-4.5.

How to read it:

  • Provider column: who you pay — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, or self-hosted.
  • Per-million tokens: input / output split. Output is 5x input on Anthropic; OpenAI ratios differ.
  • Throughput / latency: rough estimate per model — Haiku-class fast, Opus-class slow.
  • OpenRouter ★: the model is available via OpenRouter at the listed price.

The display updates daily. Bookmark it. Treat any number you remember from a previous month as stale.

The matrix also catches the model-alias traps. claude-3-5-sonnet-*, claude-sonnet-4-*, claude-sonnet-4.5, and claude-sonnet-5 are four different models with four different prices. The matrix labels every row with the exact model ID the API expects — the only safe way to pick.

Per-skill alternate defaults

The pinned model should match the size and shape of the job.

SkillJob shapeDefault tierWhy
botsitter-reviewFirst-pass voice-note → markdown draftHaiku 4.5 (cheap)Short structured output; instruction-following already tight
botsitter-review (review-pass)Quality tightening, body-flow checkSonnet 5 (balanced)Catches the flow issues Haiku drifts on
botsitter-image-promptImage prompt generationSonnet 5 (balanced)Prompt quality compounds; bad prompt → bad image → bad draft
botsitter-alt-textAlt-text generationHaiku 4.5 or local small (cheap)Mechanical, short, no cleverness needed
affiliate-link-tagURL rewrite passLocal script (free)Pure regex; no model needed
voice-note-to-published-review (orchestrator)Glue calls + body assemblyHaiku 4.5 (cheap)Mostly templating; the heavy work happens in child skills
first-hand-vs-research-only review classifierOne-shot classificationHaiku 4.5 (cheap)Single-label classification on a short prompt

Operators who pin one model across every skill end up overpaying on the cheap jobs and under-serving the expensive ones.

The override

The default is the floor, not a ceiling. The override lives in two places: the CLI flag on the run command, and the model name in the system prompt.

CLI override:

hermes run botsitter-review --provider anthropic --model claude-sonnet-5 \
  --input voice-note.m4a --amzn https://amzn.to/<short>

Same skill, same prompt, same input — but the model for that single call is Sonnet 5 instead of the pinned Haiku 4.5. Use it when the transcript is unusually long, when the first draft came back sloppy, or when testing a new tier before changing the global default.

System-prompt override (permanent): edit the model: field in ~/.hermes/skills/botsitter-review/SKILL.md. Change only after the CLI override has proven the new model across at least five diverse reviews. The two paths are deliberately redundant: CLI is per-call and reversible, system-prompt is persistent.

What not to do

  • Don’t pin Opus as the default “to be safe.” Opus is 5x the input and 5x the output price of Haiku; the extra reasoning budget goes unused on short structured drafts and shows up as a monthly bill line item.
  • Don’t pin the cheapest model on the matrix and hope. Small context, weaker instruction-following, slower on complex prompts — if draft quality drops, the operator pays in cleanup time.
  • Don’t change the pinned default based on a single bad draft. Five diverse calls is the minimum sample size.
  • Don’t lock the default across every skill. Per-skill defaults exist because job shapes are different; one global default overpays on the cheap jobs.
  • Don’t trust a remembered price. Refresh the matrix before every default change; mid-year price moves are common.
  • Don’t confuse model family generations. claude-sonnet-4.5 and claude-sonnet-5 are different models with different prices and capability ceilings; the same is true across the GPT-4o, GPT-5, and o-series lines.

Verification checklist

Five commands confirm what is happening before changing the pinned default:

  1. Pinned model: grep '^model:' ~/.hermes/skills/botsitter-review/SKILL.md
  2. Last call’s model: Inspect the response usage block; on Anthropic and OpenAI this is part of every response.
  3. Live price snapshot: https://agenticbotsitter.com/websites/ai-model-matrix/model-matrix.html
  4. Last 7d spend by model: hermes logs --filter model=<X> --sum-tokens
  5. Cron configuration: crontab -l | grep botsitter-review shows whether any pre-pinned defaults exist on the cron side.

Sources

Last verified: 2026-07-14 against the live model matrix and the pinned botsitter-review default in ~/.hermes/skills/botsitter-review/SKILL.md.

Sources

#model#llm#default#botsitter#matrix

Submit a take

Have a different read on this? Drop a comment below — your email isn't published, and I read every one. Nothing leaves the site until I approve it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.